RRR: Correspondence/envoy
288
year: 1130
initiator: Patriarch Stephen of Jerusalem
recipient: Archbishoop Diego Gelmirez of Compostela
text: Aug. 1128 – Dec. 24 1130. Patriarch Stephen of Jerusalem writes to Archbishop Diego Gelmirez of Compostela. He recommends Aymericus, a canon of the Holy Sepulchre. He asks Diego to ratify the appointment of Aymericus to the church of Nogueira, which is a dependency of the Holy Sepulchre.
Aug. 1128 – Dec. 24 1130. Patriarch Stephen of Jerusalem writes to Archbishop Diego Gelmirez of Compostela. He recommends Aymericus, a canon of the Holy Sepulchre. He asks Diego to ratify the appointment of Aymericus to the church of Nogueira, which is a dependency of the Holy Sepulchre.
sources: Historia Compostellana, p. 463
RRR: Correspondence/envoy
303
year: 1131
initiator: Abbot Bernard of Clairvaux
recipient: Patriarch William of Jerusalem
text: 1130 - 1131. Abbot Bernard of Clairvaux writes to William [of Malines], patriarch of Jerusalem [on his election?], encouraging him to humility. (Bernard of Clairvaux, ‘Epistolae’ 8:364-7, no. 393) (RRH no. 238)
1130 - 1131. Abbot Bernard of Clairvaux writes to William [of Malines], patriarch of Jerusalem [on his election?], encouraging him to humility. (Bernard of Clairvaux, ‘Epistolae’ 8:364-7, no. 393) (RRH no. 238)
sources: Bernard of Clairvaux, ‘Epistolae’ 8:364-7, no. 393 (RRH no. 238)
RRR: Correspondence/envoy
304
year: 1131
initiator: Abbot Bernard of Clairvaux
recipient: Patriarch William of Jerusalem
institution: Templars
text: 1130 - 1131. Abbot Bernard of Clairvaux writes to Patriarch [William] of Jerusalem, recommending the Knights Templar. Replying to the patriarch, Bernard writes that his answer is brought by frater Andreas.
1130 - 1131. Abbot Bernard of Clairvaux writes to Patriarch [William] of Jerusalem, recommending the Knights Templar. Replying to the patriarch, Bernard writes that his answer is brought by frater Andreas.
sources: Bernard of Clairvaux, ‘Epistolae’ 7:393, no. 175 (RRH no. 238)
RRR: Correspondence/envoy
305
year: 1132
initiator: Pope Innocent II
text: Feb. 2. Cluny. Pope Innocent II announces that he has had letters from the patriarch of Jerusalem and the bishop of Bethlehem recognizing his pontificate.
Feb. 2. Cluny. Pope Innocent II announces that he has had letters from the patriarch of Jerusalem and the bishop of Bethlehem recognizing his pontificate.
sources: Innocent II, ‘Epistolae’, p. 374, no. 13 (RRH no. 140)
RRR: Correspondence/envoy
310
year: 1132
initiator: Shams al-Muluk Isma‘il of Damascus
recipient: ‘commandant’ of the Franks
text: *Late in the year. Exchange of letters between Shams al-Muluk Isma‘il of Damascus and the ‘commandant’ of the Franks over the confiscation by the lord of Beirut of bales of linen carried by Muslim merchants.
*Late in the year. Exchange of letters between Shams al-Muluk Isma‘il of Damascus and the ‘commandant’ of the Franks over the confiscation by the lord of Beirut of bales of linen carried by Muslim merchants.
sources: Ibn al-Qalanisi, p. 216
RRR: Correspondence/envoy
326
year: 1134
initiator: Pons, count of Tripoli
recipient: King Fulk
text: *Oct. 1-31. Count Pons of Tripoli writes to King Fulk of Jerusalem, appealing for assistance.
*Oct. 1-31. Count Pons of Tripoli writes to King Fulk of Jerusalem, appealing for assistance.
sources: Ibn al-Qalanisi, p. 222
RRR: Correspondence/envoy
327
year: 1134
initiator: B. patriarchae Hierosolymitani cancellarius and Bernardus Vaccarius
recipient: Archbishop Syrus of Genoa
text: Dec. 25 1133 – Dec. 24 1134. B. patriarchae Hierosolymitani cancellarius and Bernardus Vaccarius report to Archbishop Syro and the consuls of Genoa on the failure of their mission to Pisa. They ask the Genoese to give an account of their efforts when they write to the king and patriarch of Jerusalem.
Dec. 25 1133 – Dec. 24 1134. B. patriarchae Hierosolymitani cancellarius and Bernardus Vaccarius report to Archbishop Syro and the consuls of Genoa on the failure of their mission to Pisa. They ask the Genoese to give an account of their efforts when they write to the king and patriarch of... more
sources: Rovere and Puncuh, I Libri Iurium 1/1:48, no. 30 (RRH no. 153)
RRR: Correspondence/envoy
344
year: 1136
initiator: Abbot Bernard of Clairvaux
recipient: Hugh, master of the Templars
institution: Templars
text: Jan. 13 1129 – May 24 1136. Abbot Bernard of Clairvaux sends his treatise De laude novae militiae to Hugo miles Christi et magister militiae Christi.
Jan. 13 1129 – May 24 1136. Abbot Bernard of Clairvaux sends his treatise De laude novae militiae to Hugo miles Christi et magister militiae Christi.
sources: Bernard of Clairvaux, ‘Liber ad milites Templi de laude novae militiae’, p. 213
RRR: Correspondence/envoy
357
year: 1137
initiator: Gaufridus Dominici Templi prior
recipient: Count Geoffrey of Anjou
institution: Templum Domini
text: Nov. 1 1135 [or 1136] – Late 1137. G[aufridus] dominici et sanctissimi Templi quod est in Ierusalem prior recommends to Count Geoffrey of Anjou one of the canons of the Templum Domini, who appears to be bringing with him a liber [probably a metrical poem on the Templum Domini composed by Achardus and revised by Gaufridus, who succeeded Achardus as prior]. [50]
Nov. 1 1135 [or 1136] – Late 1137. G[aufridus] dominici et sanctissimi Templi quod est in Ierusalem prior recommends to Count Geoffrey of Anjou one of the canons of the Templum Domini, who appears to be bringing with him a liber [probably a metrical poem on the Templum Domini composed by Achardus... more
sources: Hiestand, ‘Gaufridus abbas’, p. 58
RRR: Correspondence/envoy
399
year: 1140
initiator: Almerich, arçidiano d’Antiochia
recipient: Archbishop Raymond of Toledo
text: †c. 1135 – Dec. 1140. Replying to Archbishop Raymond of Toledo, Almerich, arçidiano d’Antiochia promises to send the result of his researches on La Fazienda de Ultra Mar.
†c. 1135 – Dec. 1140. Replying to Archbishop Raymond of Toledo, Almerich, arçidiano d’Antiochia promises to send the result of his researches on La Fazienda de Ultra Mar.
sources: Almerich, arcidiano de Antiochia, p. 43; Kedar, ‘Sobre la Génesis’, pp. 131-6